High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 07 DEL CK 0141

Director of Income Tax vs Dalmiya Jan Kalyan Trust

Delhi High Court · Decided on 22 July 2002 · Citation: (2002) 178 CTR 402 : (2002) 258 ITR 95 : (2003) 127 TAXMAN 551

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sharda Aggarwal, J · D.K. Jain, J
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax A. No. 152 of 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 258 words
1.

This appeal u/s 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short "the Act"), is directed against the order dated July 11, 2001, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short "the Tribunal") in I. T. A. No. 795/Delhi of 1996 pertaining to the assessment year 1992-93.

2.

The Assessing Officer had disallowed exemption to the assessed-trust u/s 11 of the Act mainly on the ground that the assessed had failed to prove the genuineness of the donations received by it from various persons, inasmuch as the donors were not produced for examination.

3.

While allowing the assessed''s appeal against the said order by the Assessing Officer and directing the Assessing Officer to grant exemption to the assessed u/s 11 of the Act, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has dealt with all the subject donations and has recorded a categorical finding that all the relevant details, including the addresses of the donors were furnished to the Assessing Officer. In fact, the Commissioner has also recorded that the details of the cheques issued by the donors towards the corpus along with permanent account numbers were furnished but for the reasons best known to the Assessing Officer these facts were not taken note of in the assessment order. The Tribunal, by the impugned order, has upheld these findings recorded by the Tribunal.

4.

The aforenoted concurrent findings recorded by the two appellate authorities are pure findings of fact giving rise to no question of law much less a substantial question of law. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.