High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 04 DEL CK 4418

Dinesh Yadav & Anr. vs Registrar, Cooperative Societies & Ors.

Delhi High Court, New Delhi · Decided on 16 April 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Kameswar Rao, J · Saurabh Banerjee, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P. (C) 761/2023

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

31 paragraphs · 595 words

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL)

1.

In terms of the last order, an additional affidavit has been filed by the Asst. Registrar from office of the Registrar of Co-operative Society, Paragraphs 8 and 9 thereof are re-produced as under:-

“8.

That, the names of these 14 verified members are recommended to be placed before Rule-90 Committee for clearance of their names for draw of lots by the DDA.

S. NONAME OF MEMBERSM. NOREMARKS
1.BILAL AHMED07TRANSFER CASE (FATHER TO SON)
2.SHEHNAZ11PROMOTER MEMBER
3.

VED PRAKASH/ ANIL

KUMAR

22TRANSFER CASE (FATHER TO SON)
4.B.S DHAIYA38PROMOTER MEMBER
5.MOHAN LAL AHUJA73PROMOTER MEMBER
6.DINESH YADAV76PROMOTER MEMBER
7.

NIRMAL CHANDRA

MATHUR

79PROMOTER MEMBER
8.GIRISH CHAND AGGARWAL/SHALABH AGGARWAL112TRANSFER CASE (FATHER TO SON)
9.S.P.RAMAN113REQUIRED DOCUMENTS COMPLTED
10.ROHIT PAL115TRANSFER CASE (FATHER TO SON)
11.KAPIL KUMAR116TRANSFER CASE (FATHER TO SON)
12.ASHOK KUMAR117REQUIRED DOCUMENTS COMPLTED
13.MAHESH YADAV118REQUIRED DOCUMENTS COMPLTED
14.MANISH VASHIST206REQUIRED DOCUMENTS COMPLTED
9.

That, it is most respectfully submitted that the petitioner, Mohan Lal Ahuja (M.NO. 73) and Mr. Dinesh Yadav (M.NO. 76) are verified promoter member in the list of members which are recommended to be placed for clearance of their names for draw of lots by the DDA.”

2.

Mr. Dholkia, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the Court may take the affidavit filed on record and dispose of the petition as the grievance of the petitioners in respect of the claim in the writ petition shall stand satisfied. He additionally submits that the time period be granted to the respondent No.1 to place the matter before Rule-90 Committee for its recommendation to be sent to the DDA for holding draw of lots. He also submits that the DDA be granted time to carry out the draw of lots.

3.

Mr. Malik, appearing for the Registrar of Co-operative Society has no objection with regard to the direction to the Registrar of Co-operative Societies for placing the matter before Rule-90 Committee for clearance of the names of the petitioners for draw of lots by the DDA. He submits as the Officers are busy in the Election Duty, the same shall be placed on or before June 30, 2024.

4.

On the other hand, the learned counsel appearing for the DDA states that she has no instructions, in the eventuality recommendations are made by the Rule-90 Committee, within which time the draw of lots shall be carried out by the DDA.

5.

Noting the submissions made by the counsel for the DDA and in the facts of this case, we are of the view that in view of the stand taken by the respondent, Registrar of Co-operative Societies in the affidavit including in paragraphs 8 & 9 as stated by Mr. Dholkia, the claim of the petitioners shall stand satisfied.

6.

Taking the submission made by Mr. Malik that the matter shall be placed before Rule-90 Committee for clearance the names of petitioners (in writ petition) for draw of lots by the DDA on or before June 30, 2024, we dispose of the petition by directing, on recommendation (if any) made by Rule-90 Committee, the DDA shall hold the draw of lots as expeditiously as possible preferably within eight weeks from the receipt of the recommendation (if any) from the Rule-90 Committee. Suffice to state, thereafter the parties shall proceed in accordance with law.

7.

The petition is disposed of.

CM APPL. 52663/2023 (for impleadment)

8.

We find that an application has been filed by the applicant for impleadment. We are not inclined to entertain this application. The same is closed. If so advised, the applicant can seek such remedy as available in law.