High CourtsDivision Bench(1998) 09 AHC CK 0060

Dinesh Kumar Mishra alias Hira Sahab Mishra vs Mirzapur Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd. and others

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 21 September 1998 · Citation: (1999) 1 AWC 76 : (1999) 1 UPLBEC 422

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.C. Mishra, J · B.K. Roy, J
CASE NUMBER
C.M.W.P. No. 29119 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 242 words

B.K. Roy and J.C. Mishra, JJ.—Heard Sri H, N. Tripathi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner who has come up with a prayer to quash Bye-law No. 31 framed by the Mirzapur Urban Cooperative Bank Limited, Mirzapur.

2.

Even though we proceeded to hear him for about twenty five minutes by now, he falls to show that it is contrary to any statutory Rule or any section of the Co-operative Societies Act, He vaguely refers to certain judgment of the Hon''ble Supreme Court to support his proposition without pointing out his fingers to such a judgment of this Court or Hon''ble Supreme Court.

3.

On the contrary. Sri H. R. Mishra, learned standing counsel relied upon a judgment of the Supreme Court fn Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. and Others Vs. Additional Industrial Tribunal and Others, . to support his contention that unless a particular Bye-law is contrary to the Act or the Rules framed thereunder, it cannot be struck down as ultra-vires.

4.

We also find that imposition of a condition on its General Members to deposit a sum of Rs. 5.000 and for those belonging to weakers sections a sum of Rs. 500 only in the Co-operative Bank, which is bound to earn interest with liberty for its withdrawal at any time is neither unreasonable nor arbitrary and contrary to the provisions contained in Rule 442 (3) of the Rules.

5.

We, accordingly, dismiss this writ petition in limine.