High Courts(2008) 04 AHC CK 0211

Dinesh Gupta vs State of U.P.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 21 April 2008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Barkat Ali Zaidi, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3387 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 199 words

B.A. Zaidi, J.—Out of two accused facing trial under section 8/21 N.D.P.S. Act, the aforenoted accusedapplicant wants bail after rejection of his bail application by the Trial Court.

2.

Heard Sri Vinay Saran, Advocate for the applicant and Sri J.K. Upadhayay, Addl. Government Advocate for the State.

3.

One and a quarter kilogram of Heroin was recovered from his briefcase, which according to Counsel for the State is valued at around 125 lacs.

4.

The only argument advanced by Counsel for the applicant is that there has been noncompliance of section 50 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, since accused was not warned that the accused had a right to get him searched before a Magistrate or a Gazetted Officer.

5.

The Counsel for the State countered the argument by saying that since the accused carried a briefcase from which the Heroin was recovered, section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 will not apply.

6.

The argument of the State cannot be rejected outright and matter will have to be decided at the time of trial.

7.

In view of these circumstances, the bail should not be granted.

8.

Bail refused.

9.

Application rejected.