High CourtsSingle Bench(2014) 05 P&H CK 0126

Dinesh vs State of Haryana

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 May 2014

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.P.S. Mann, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM M-16250 of 2014

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 185 words

T.P.S. Mann, J.—The petitioner is in custody since 18.2.2014. As per the prosecution, he was having a country made pistol with him which he fired but the complainant had a narrow escape.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the trial Court while dismissing the petition filed by the petitioner for the grant of regular bail mentioned that apart from the present case, there were three more criminal cases. Out of them, in case u/s 394 IPC registered at Police Station Hathin, he stands acquitted. The case u/s 25 of the Arms Act pertains to recovery of a country made pistol which was said to have been used in the present crime. The third case against the petitioner is one u/s 174-A IPC registered at Police Station Hathin. The said criminal case is off-shoot of the aforementioned case u/s 394 IPC in which he already stands acquitted.

3.

Further confinement of the petitioner behind the bars to await the outcome of the trial will not serve any useful purpose.

4.

Resultantly, the petition is accepted. Bail to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palwal.