High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 06 MAD CK 0108

Dindigul Gandhi Market Kaikani Viyabarigal Sangangalin Kootamaipu Rep. by its President vs The commissioner of Municipalities, & Ors.

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 June 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.S.Sivagnanam, P.Velmurugan
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
913 of 2013 and M P (MD) Nos 1, 2 & 3 of 2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 188 words
1.

Heard Mr.K.A.Thirumalaiappan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr.V.R.Shanmuganathan, learned Special Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

2.

This writ appeal has been filed challenging the order, dated 25.04.2013 made in W.P.(MD).No.6927 of 2013, which was filed to direct the respondents not to shift the vegetable market situated at Gandhi Maithanam, Dindigul to Lorry Pettai, Dindigul, and the same was dismissed by the impugned order, after taking into consideration the factual position as well as the legal position enunciated by the Honourable Supreme Court in Md.Murtaza vs. State of Assam, reported in 2011 (9) Scale 536.

3.

The record of the proceedings shows that notice was not ordered to the respondents and the matter was merely adjourned by one week on 27.08.2013. Thereafter, no steps have been taken by the appellant to move the appeal. Thus, at this distance of time, we do not propose to entertain this appeal as we find that the reasons assigned by the Writ Court are proper and valid.

4.

With the above observations this writ appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.