High CourtsFull Bench(1896) 07 AHC CK 0017

Din Dayal vs Patrakhan

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 21 July 1896 · Citation: (1896) ILR (All) 481

HON’BLE JUDGES
Knox, J · John Edge, J · Blair, J · Banerji, J · Aikman, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 132 words

John Edge, Kt., C.J.—This is an appeal from the order of a Subordinate Judge passed in an appeal from an order of a Munsif on an objection filed to an application for execution of a decree. The suit was one of the nature cognizable by a Court of Small Causes, and the value of the subject matter did not exceed Rs. 500. It has been held by this Court in Harakh v. Ram Sarup ILR All. 579, that Section 586 of the CPC bars such an appeal in such a case. The same view of the law was taken by the Calcutta Court in Sri Bullov Bhattacharji v. Baburam Chatlopadhya ILR Cal. 169, and by the Madras Court in Aithala v. Subbanna ILR Mad. 116. We accordingly dismiss this appeal with costs.