High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 03 RAJ CK 0030

Dilip Kumar Sharma vs Hansa

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 8 March 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vijay Bishnoi, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16736 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 190 words

Vijay Bishnoi, J

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 30.9.2021 passed by the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Jahajpur, District Bhilwara (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial court’), whereby the application filed by the petitioner under Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. has been dismissed.

The trial court has opined that the petitioner has sought amendment in the plaint on the basis of report of the Moka Commissioner while claiming that the defendant has made encroachment over 1 ft. and 1 inch of land and, therefore, he may be allowed to amend the plaint with a prayer to remove the said encroachment by the defendant.

The trial court after considering the report of Moka Commissioner has opined that from the said report, there is no mention of any encroachment by the defendant and, therefore, the application cannot be granted.

Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and having gone through the material available on record, I do not find any illegality in the impugned order passed by the trial court.

The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed.

The stay petition is also dismissed.