Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1999) 02 SC CK 0123

Dhruv K. Jaiswal vs State of Bihar

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 19 February 1999 · Citation: AIR 2000 SC 209 : (1999) AIRSCW 4299 : (2000) CriLJ 410 : (1999) 1 PLJR 96 : (2000) 10 SCC 84

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. B. Shah, J · K. T. Thomas, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Petns. for Special Leave to Appeal (Cri.) No. 227 of 1999

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 197 words
1.

The petitioner is involved in a murder case and was taken into custody on 21-2-1988. According to the learned Counsel the petitioner continues to be in custody even though the Investigating Agency has laid the final report. The impugned order has been passed on a bail application filed by the petitioner. The order reads thus :

Heard counsel for the parties.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find any merit in this application. It is accordingly dismissed.

2.

We are unable to find from the aforesaid order as to any reason why the learned Judge did not find any merit in the application for bail. Learned Counsel for the petitioner adhered certain grounds to release the petitioner on bail. We do not know whether he urged such grounds before the High Court, as the impugned order is silent about it. In such a situation we feel that a more feasible course is to permit the petitioner to move the High Court again. If any such application is filed we request the High Court to pass a reasoned order while disposing of the application. With the aforesaid observations the SLP is dismissed.