High CourtsSingle Bench(2014) 01 RAJ CK 0168

Dharmendra Kumar Gupta vs State of Rajasthan and Others

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 3 January 2014 · Citation: (2014) 1 WLN 636

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.C. Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision Petition No. 1211/2013 and Criminal Misc. Stay Application No. 4304/2013

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 209 words

M.C. Sharma, J.—This revision petition has been filed against the order dt. 09.10.2013 passed by Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu in Criminal Appeal No. 66/2011, whereby he dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner and affirmed the order dt. 01.09.2011 passed by District Collector, Jhunjhunu in Case No. 93/2011, by which he allowed the application filed by Enforcement Officer under Sec. 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and confiscated the seized 55 Qtls. Gram and directed the District Supply Officer, Jhunjhunu to auction the said confiscated Gram. Without going into the merits of the case, learned counsel for the petitioner wants liberty to file a fresh application before the Collector, Jhunjhunu. He further wants that direction should be given to the Collector, Jhunjhunu to decide the said application afresh, in accordance with law.

2.

Learned PP appearing for the State has opposed the same.

3.

The prayer of the counsel for the petitioner seems to be genuine, hence the same is allowed. The order dt. 09.10.2013 passed by Sessions Judge, Jhunjhunu in Cr. Appeal No. 66/2011 and order dt. 01.09.2011 passed by District Collector, Jhunjhunu in Case No. 93/2011 are set-aside and the revision petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty and direction. Stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.