High CourtsDivision Bench(2011) 05 SHI CK 0188

Dharam Pal and Others vs State of H.P. and Another

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 11 May 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kurian Joseph, C.J · V.K. Ahuja, J
CASE NUMBER
CWP No. 2965 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 158 words

Kurian Joseph, C.J.—The Petitioners claim work charge status/regularization with all consequential benefits from the date they completed 10 years of continued service. Reliance is placed on the decision of the Supreme Court rendered in P.V. Papanna and others Vs. K. Padmanabhaiah,

2.

The learned Deputy Advocate General points out that the factual aspects are to be verified by the competent authority. The Petitioners may file appropriate representation(s) furnishing all factual details before the second Respondent within a period of one month from today. The second Respondent/competent authority will look into the matter, verify the facts and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, in light also of the decision referred to above within a period of another four months. The Petitioner concerned will produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of the judgment, referred to above, while submitting the representation(s).

3.

The writ petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.