High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 01 RAJ CK 0055

Devkishan s/o Shri Bagtawar Mal vs The Rajasthan Housing Board

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 25 January 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
5441 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

44 paragraphs · 412 words
1.

By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has approached

this Court seeking to challenge the allotment letter (Annex.2)

dated 23.12.2009 issued by the respondent Rajasthan Housing

Board, Hanumangarh to the petitioner for allotment of house

no.2/75 category MIG in the scheme named New Land Manaksar

Link Road, Rajasthan Housing Board, Suratgarh.

2.

The petitioner has raised a grievance regarding the rate

charged by the respondent for the extra land admeasuring

149.484 sq. meters at Rs.1900/- per square meter claiming that

the said excess land rate charged by the respondent is

unauthorised and illegal.

3.

In the reply to the writ petition, it is asserted that the

Housing Board has taken a conscious policy decision that

additional land shall be chargeable at 50% extra from the normal

rate of land. The said policy decision is not in challenge in the

instant writ petition. Condition No.4 of the order dated 14.7.2009

prescribing the applicable rates of lands in Housing Board

Schemes reads as under :-

"VERNACULAR MATTER OMITTED"

4.

In view of these facts, it is evident that the Rajasthan

Housing Board was undoubtedly entitled to charge at the rate of

Rs.1900/- per square meter for the extra land admeasuring

149.484 square meters while issuing the allotment letter to the

petitioner. The petitioner had an option whether or not to go

ahead with the deal. In case, the petitioner felt that the rate of

extra land being charged by the Rajasthan Housing Board was

excessive, then he could have withdrawn from the process of

allotment.

5.

Be that as it may. Having regard to the material available on

record, I am of the firm opinion that the allotment letter

(Annex.2) dated 23.12.2009 wherein the rate of extra land has

been charged at Rs.1900/- per square meters does not suffer from

any illegality, irregularity or arbitrariness so as to require

invocation of the extraordinary writ jurisdiction of this Court. It

may further be observed that the petitioner has managed to stall

the proceedings of allotment for a period of nearly six and half

years by filing the instant writ petition and thus, if he still seeks

allotment of the house in question, then he shall have to accede to

the additional charges etc. which may be levied for the delay

occasioned in payment towards the allotment as per the

norms/policy decisions of adopted by the Rajasthan Housing

Board.

6.

The writ petition as well as stay application are dismissed

with the above observations.