Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 04 ITAT CK 3606

Devesh Varshneya vs DC/ACIT Centre Circle, Gurgaon

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 22 April 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amitabh Shukla, Accountant Member · C.N. Prasad, Judicial Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.6887 to 6893/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 308 words

PER BENCH

All these appeals are filed by the assessee against the common order of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Gurgaon dated 14.08.2025 for the A.Y. 2016-17 to 2018-19 and common order of the Ld. CIT(A)-3, Gurgaon dated 14.08.2025 for the A.Y. 2019-20 to 2021-22.

2.

In all these appeals the assessee has raised various grounds in sustaining the additions made while completing the assessment u/s.153C of the Act by the AO. Also challenged the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in disposing of these appeals exparte without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee and in violation of principle of natural justice.

3.

The Ld. Counsel for the assessee at the outset submitted that all these appeals were disposed of by the Ld. CIT(A) without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. The Ld. Counsel submitted that the appeals of the assessee were also dismissed without admitting the application under Rule 46A for admission of additional evidences. The Ld. Counsel further submitted that even during the assessment proceedings the assessee could not submit the evidences and explain the cash deposits, therefore, the Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that an opportunity may be given to the assessee to explain the cash deposits in bank account to the AO.

4.

On the other hand the Ld. DR has no objection in restoring the appeals to the file of the AO for denovo assessment.

5.

On hearing both the sides and perusing the orders of the authorities below we are of the view that these appeals should go back to the file for the AO for fresh assessment after providing adequate opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The assessee shall cooperate with the AO in the assessment proceedings and may furnish necessary details in support of the contentions.

6.

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose.