High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 02 BOM CK 0034

Devendra S/o Sukhdas Baghele vs Anita W/o Devendra Baghele

Bombay High Court · Decided on 1 February 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. M. Deshpande
CASE NUMBER
690 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

45 paragraphs · 402 words
1.

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally

with the consent of the parties.

2.

Heard Mrs. Charlewar, the learned counsel for the

applicant. None for the non-applicants, though they are served with

the notice of final disposal of the application.

3.

The non-applicants filed proceedings under Section 125

of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the present applicant vide

Misc. Criminal Case No. 89/2009. The learned Judicial Magistrate,

First Class, Sakoli on 16.1.2013 allowed the said application and

directed to the present applicant that he shall pay maintenance of

Rs.1,000/- per month to the non-applicant no.1 and Rs.500/- per

month to the non-applicant no.2 from the date of the application.

4.

Feeling aggrieved thereby, the present applicant/

husband filed revision before the Sessions Court, Bhandara which

was registered as Criminal Revision No.20/2013. The learned

Sessions Judge on 09.4.2014 dismissed the revision for not paying

the paper book charges. It is that order the applicant is challenging

before this Court.

5.

The learned Additional Sessions Judge has shown too

technical approach in respect of adjudicating the lis which was

pending before him. The opportunity ought to have been given to

the applicant/husband to deposit the paper book charges and ought

to have decided the revision on its own merits. In my view, the

impugned order cannot stand to the scrutiny of law. Hence, I pass

the following order :

ORDER

(i) The order dated 09.4.2014 passed by the learned

Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Criminal Revision

No. 20/2013, dismissing the revision in default for non-payment of

paper book charges is hereby set aside.

(ii) The applicant is directed to deposit the paper book

charges in the Court of the learned Principal District and Sessions

Judge, Bhandara within two weeks from today.

(iii) Criminal Revision No.20/2013 is restored to the file

of learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Bhandara. The

learned Sessions Judge shall issue fresh notice to the present non-

applicants and shall decide the revision on its own merits after

following the principles of natural justice.

(iv) The present applicant is directed to deposit the

entire amount of arrears of maintenance before the learned

Revisional Court within a period of six weeks from today. On such

deposit, the non-applicants will be entitled to withdraw the said

amount since it is against arrears of maintenance.

(v) The criminal application is partly allowed and

disposed of. Rule accordingly. No costs.