High CourtsSingle Bench(2001) 04 UK CK 0007

Devendra Singh vs State of Uttaranchal and Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 4 April 2001 · Citation: (2001) 1 UC 577

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.C.Verma, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 278 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 179 words

P.C. Verma, J.—Sri S.P. Agarwal has accepted notice for C.B.I. He prays for and is allowed four weeks time to file counter affidavit.

2.

List after four weeks.

3.

After signing of the above order, it was pointed out by the Learned Counsel for the applicant that due to inadvertent the above order has been wrongly transcribed. The order has been wrongly transcribed.

4.

Heard Learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Govt. Advocate.

5.

It has been submitted by the Learned Counsel for the applicant that charge-sheet has been submitted in the year 1989 and since then the trial is pending in the court of special Judge, C.B.I. Dehradun.

6.

In these circumstances, the Learned Counsel for the applicant confined his prayer only upto to the extent of early disposal of the trial.

7.

Therefore, it is directed that the Session trial No. 38 of 1993 State v. Yogendra Verma and Ors. pending before the special Judge, C.B.I. Dehradun be disposed of expeditiously.

8.

In view of the above, directions the writ petition is finally disposed, of.