High CourtsDivision Bench(1914) 07 MAD CK 0008

Desireddi Yellamander vs Sekhakolli Chinna Pitchaiah

Madras High Court · Decided on 20 July 1914 · Citation: AIR 1915 Mad 314 : 25 Ind. Cas. 58 : (1914) 1 LW 573

HON’BLE JUDGES
Oldfield, J · Napier, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 101 words
1.

Both Courts have found that the decree-holder applied for the continuance of the sale in order to secure the attendance of more bidders, and

that his application was in aid of execution. Their decisions on this finding in respondent''s favour are justified by Troylokya Nath Bose v. Jyoti

Prokash Nandi 30 CA. 761 : 8 C.W.N. 251."" The Courts have always placed a wide construction on the words ""step-in-aid of execution"" in

Article 182, Schedule I, of the Limitation Act and we are not prepared to dissent from this conclusion. The appeal against the appellate order is

dismissed with costs.