High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 09 DEL CK 1875

Designarch Consultants Pvt Ltd & Anr. vs Jumeirah Beach Resort LLC

Delhi High Court · Decided on 19 September 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amit Bansal, J · Rajiv Shakdher, J
CASE NUMBER
FAO(OS)(COMM) 144/2021 & CM APPL. 40965/2021; FAO(OS)(COMM) 181/2021 & CM. 46584/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

46 paragraphs · 591 words

AMIT BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

1.

The present cross-appeals have been filed against the impugned judgment dated 9th November, 2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in CS(COMM)124/2021. By way of the impugned judgment, the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CPC’) filed by the plaintiff/Jumeirah Beach Resort LLC (hereinafter referred to as “Jumeirah”), was decided.

2.

The learned Single Judge partly allowed the application filed by Jumeirah and restrained the defendants, Designarch Consultants Pvt. Ltd. and Designarch Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Designarch”) from using the marks ‘BURJBANGALORE’, ‘BURJMUMBAI’, ‘BURJDELHI’, ‘BURJGURUGRAM’ and ‘BURJGURGAON’ till the pendency of the said suit. However, since the residential project ‘BURJNOIDA’ was in construction for the last ten years, the learned Single Judge allowed the use of the mark ‘BURJNOIDA’ for the said project.

3.

During the course of hearing of the appeals, the terms of a possible settlement were discussed with the counsel appearing on behalf of the parties on 3rd September, 2024, 17th September, 2024 and 18th September, 2024.

4.

At the hearing today, i.e., 19th September, 2024, counsel for the parties, on instructions from their respective clients, have agreed to the following terms of settlement:

I. Jumeirah acknowledges that Designarch are the owners of the

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

trademark “BURJNOIDA” and the logo ‘ ’.

II. Designarch acknowledge that Jumeirah is the owner of the trademark

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

“BURJ AL ARAB” and the logo ‘ ’.

III. Designarch shall not make any modifications to the “BURJNOIDA” tower as depicted in the photograph dated 20th August, 2024, annexed herewith as Annexure-A.

IV. Designarch undertake to withdraw the cancellation petitions filed against Jumeirah’s mark within seven (7) working days, as detailed below:

MarkApplication No.ClassStatus
Jumeirah Beach Resort LLC Marks
BURJ AL ARAB125332535Cancellation filed by Designarch. C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)130/ 2023
36Cancellation filed by Designarch. C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)131/ 2023
39Cancellation filed by Designarch.
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)132/ 2023
41Cancellation filed by Designarch. C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)133/ 2023
42Cancellation filed by Designarch. C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)134/ 2023

V. Jumeirah undertakes to withdraw the cancellation petitions filed against Designarch’s marks within seven (7) working days, as set forth below:

MarkApplication No.ClassStatus
BURJNOIDA209336737

Cancellation filed by Jumeirah

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 124/2022

411239537

Cancellation filed by Jumeirah

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 315/2022

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

Designarch or their employees, agents and directors will not use the mark

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

“BURJNOIDA” and the logo “ ” to suggest any connection with or relation to Jumeirah, in any manner whatsoever.

VI. Designarch undertake to withdraw the oppositions filed against Jumeirah’s marks within seven (7) working days, as per the details given below:

MarkApplication No.ClassStatus
BURJ488034739Opposition filed by Designarch Opposition No-1108306
BURJ488035141Opposition filed by Designarch Opposition No-1108307
BURJ488035343Opposition filed by Designarch Opposition No-1269701

VII. Designarch covenant and agree not to design, construct or develop any building that is identical and/or resembles the pictorial reference given in Annexure-B.

VIII. Jumeirah undertakes to withdraw the opposition filed against Designarch’s mark within seven (7) working days, as per the details given below:

MarkApplication No.ClassStatus
467436306Opposed by Jumeirah vide Opposition No.1106513
Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

IX. Designarch undertake not to apply for or use in any manner BURJ or any BURJ formative mark other than BURJNOIDA in the future. Designarch further undertake to withdraw their pending trademark applications, as detailed in the table below within seven (7) working days:

MarkApplication No.ClassStatus
BURJBANGALORE209337137Objected
BURJMUMBAI398220737Objected
BURJGURUGRAM417976637Opposed

X. The settlement terms agreed by the parties are final and irrevocable. The settlement shall bind the parties, their successors, representatives and assigns.

5.

The appeals are disposed of in terms of the aforesaid settlement.

6.

All pending applications shall stand closed.

Annexure-A

Exhibit reproduced from the original judgment

ANNEXURE-B