AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Gita Mittal, J
This writ petition, couched as a public interest litigation, relates to the exercise of jurisdiction by the District Consumer Fora constituted under the
provisions of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
The petitioner has placed reliance on the order dated 3s1t October, 2007 passed by the State Commission, Delhi in Revision
Petition No. 07/18 Singh’s Dental Hospital v. Amrit Lal Dureja. In this case, a preliminary objection regarding the territorial jurisdiction of the
District Forum (South-West) was taken on the premise that the  Dental Hospital of the petitioner was located in the territorial jurisdiction of the
District Forum (West) whereas the complaint was filed before the District Forum (South â€" West). This objection was rejected by the District Forum
(South West), resulting in the filing of the revision petition. By the decision dated 31st October, 2007, the State Commission, Delhi had held as follows :
“4. Even otherwise city of Delhi is one District and has been divided into several districts for the sake of administrative convenience and
not for the sake of territorial jurisdiction. Consumer Protection Act 1986, provides that there shall be one District Forum in one District.
Since Delhi happens to be one District, every District Forum has jurisdiction over every case and if any District Forum takes final decision
in the matter, irrespective of having no administrative territorial jurisdicion, the order cannot be set aside. Order can be set aside, if the
person taking final decision is not competent to take decision. District Forums are presided by a person who is or has been or is qualified to
be a District Judge and since every District Forum is headed by such person, therefore any decision taken by any District Forum
irrespective of the complaint being not within the territorial jurisdiction of the concerned District Forum cannot be set aside or held
invalid.â€
The writ petitioner has relied on other orders of the State Commission passed thereafter placing reliance on the decision dated 31st October, 2007
holding that Delhi was one district for the purposes of the territorial jurisdiction of the District Forums.
A grievance is made before us that despite the clear dicta of the decisions of the State Commission, the District Forums are not abiding by the same
and are dismissing complaints on grounds of territorial jurisdiction in violation of the binding findings.
It cannot be denied that judicial discipline mandates that the District Forums shall strictly abide by the decisions of the State Commission, which bind
their consideration.
In view thereof, all District Forums shall ensure that they abide by the principles laid down by the State Commission in their decisions.
This writ petition and application are disposed of in the above terms.