High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 02 J&K CK 0109

Deepak Raj vs Union Territory Through Director General Of Police & Anr

Jammu And Kashmir High Court · Decided on 3 February 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Kumar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1007 Of 2019, Miscellaneous Criminal Cases No. 292 Of 2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 432 words

None present.

1.

On the last date of hearing also there was no representation. As a matter of fact, this case has been listed thrice but notice in the matter is yet to be

issued.

2.

This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of charge sheet submitted by the police against the petitioner in the court of learned

Principal District and Sessions Judge, Pulwama (Trial Court) in FIR No.22 of 2018 dated 13th March, 2018 registered in Police Station Pampore

under Sections 15/18 NDPS Act.

3.

The petitioner, it is stated, is already enlarged on bail. Impugned charge sheet/ challan presented before the court for commission of offences under

Sections 15/18 NDPS Act, has been challenged on the ground that the police has not been able to collect sufficient evidence to connect the petitioner

with the commission of the offences and that there have been several procedural irregularities committed while conducting the investigation in the

matter. It is the further case of the petitioner that the allegations levelled against the petitioner even if taken to be true on their face value do no

constitute ingredients of Sections 15 and 18 of the NDPS Act.

4.

I have considered the matter in the absence of assistance of learned counsel for the petitioner and do not find it a case for interference while

exercising the inherent powers vested in this Court by virtue of Section 482 Cr.P.C.

5.

The issues which have been raised by the petitioner in this petition can be well urged by the petitioner before the trial court when the matter comes

up for framing of charge. The petitioner is well within his rights to urge and convince the trial court that the offences alleged against him are not made

out and he is entitled to discharge. The truth or otherwise of the allegations contained therein is required to be seen by the trial court on the basis of

evidence which is led before it and the challan cannot be challenged on the ground that the allegations contained therein are false and frivolous and are

not substantiated by evidence. This court while hearing a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. cannot take par the character of a trial court and sift the

evidence on record meticulously to find out as to whether the offences are made out or not.

6.

In view of the aforesaid, I find no merit in this petition. The same is accordingly dismissed along with connected applications. Nothing said herein

shall prejudice the case of the petitioner which is pending trial before the trial court.