Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2026) 03 ITAT CK 2895

Deepak Kumar vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 17 March 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, J
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 633/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 202 words

ORDER

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13 arises against the Addl./JCIT( A) , Thane’s DIN & order No. ITBA/APL/ S/250/2025-26/1083176308(1) dated 01.12.2025, in proceedings u/ s 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in shor t “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the p arties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It emerges during the course of hearing that the assessee/appellant is aggrieved against both the learned lower authorities’ respective findings treating his cash deposits of Rs.12,69,000/- as unexplained; in assessment order dated 09.10.2019 as upheld in the lower appellate discussion.

4.

That being the case, this tribunal notice s from the assessee’s cash flow stateme nt filed at pages 7 & 88 of his paper book that he had withdrawals of Rs.9,26,000/- and in additio n to that; the learned lo wer authorities have nowhere considered his cash in hand in accumulated past saving. Be that as it may, it is deemed appropriate that a lump sum addition of Rs.1 ,50,000/- only in the asse ssee’s hands is just and proper with a rider that the same shall not be treated as a precedent. Necessary computation shall fo llow as per law.

5.

This assessee’s appeal is partly allowed.