High CourtsDivision Bench(2021) 06 CHH CK 0112

Deepak Goyal vs Krisan Kumar Shriwas

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 28 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Prashant Kumar Mishra, J · Parth Prateem Sahu, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Review Petition No. 90 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 442 words
1.

This is an application for review of the order dated 19.1.2021 passed in MAC No.837 of 2015.

2.

The applicant (henceforth 'the review petitioner') filed this review petition seeking review of the order dated 19.1.2021 on the ground that though in

MAC No.837/2015 a specific ground has been raised that the Tribunal committed error by not granting interest from the date of filing of application

for compensation but inadvertently while passing the order under review the interest has not been awarded.

3.

Mr. Sourabh Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent No.3 would submit that in view of provisions contained under Section 171 of the Motor

Vehicles Act,1988 (for brevity 'the Act, 1988') the interest part is directive in nature and hence in the review petition the interest could bot be

awarded.

4.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

5.

In appeal, learned counsel for the appellant has specifically raised a ground that the Tribunal has not awarded interest from the date of filing of

application for compensation. Award of interest under the Act, 1988 has been held to be awarded in ordinary course and if for any reason interest is

not to be awarded then the reasons are to be assigned for the same. The Act under which compensation was claimed is a beneficial piece of

legislation. Claimant become entitled for compensation after motor accident subject to proof of accident, injuries, etc. Section 171 of the Act, 1988

provides for award of interest. Word 'shall' is used for payment of interest in addition to the amount of compensation. From the terminology used

under Section 171 of the Act, 1988 award of interest on compensation in the opinion of this Court has been made mandatory. Due to inadvertent

mistake, this Court could not award interest on the amount of compensation

6.

In Kajal v Jagdish Chand and Others reported in {2020 (4) SCC 413}, the Supreme Court categorically observed in para 31 that normally interest

should be granted from the date of filing of the petition and if in appeal enhancement is made the interest should again be from the date of filing of the

petition.

7.

In view of the aforesaid, we allow this review petition and hold that the review petitioner is entitled for interest at the rate of 7% per annum on the

awarded amount of compensation i.e., Â Rs. 12,54,120/- (Twelve Lakhs fifty four thousand one hundred and twenty) from the date of filing of the

claim petition till the date of its realization.

8.

Copy of this order shall also be made part of the record of the MAC No.837/ 2015.