High CourtsDIVISION BENCH(2017) 10 PAT CK 0001

Deep Sikha Bharti, D/o Sri Nawal Kishore vs The Union of India

Patna High Court · Decided on 1 October 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Nilu Agrawal
CASE NUMBER
1298 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 270 words
1.

Delay of 92 days is condoned under the circumstances

indicated in IA No.5645 of 2015. The matter is even heard on the

merits.

2.

Appeal is directed against the order passed by a learned

Single Judge dated 2.7.2014 in CWJC No.21702 of 2011 and

CWJC No.10497 of 2011. Submission of the counsel for the

appellant is that the impugned order suffers from the vice that no

administrative order could have been passed freezing the accounts

of the family members by the Postal authorities and this aspect of

the matter was not properly considered by the learned Single Judge

which is a good ground for setting aside the order and interfering

with the said decision.

3.

After having heard counsel for the appellant and learned

Additional Solicitor General for Union of India, who informs the

Court that the CBI after due investigation has filed charge sheet

against not only the employee but even the family members, then

the learned Single Judge has rightly held that the proper forum for

such relief could be the Court having jurisdiction on the matter.

4.

The submission of the counsel that only on the basis of

allegations nobody should be held guilty is absolutely correct but

then the forum for giving a clean chit will be the criminal court

where charge sheet has been filed. The appellant is free to move

the said forum for passing any kind of order with regard to freezing

of the accounts. The court will be free to take a decision on its own

merit irrespective of whatever the learned Single judge may have

said in the impugned order.