High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 01 AHC CK 0040

Debi Prashad vs Shama Charan

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 29 January 1910 · Citation: 5 Ind. Cas. 584

HON’BLE JUDGES
John Stanely, C.J · Banerji, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 233 words
1.

This is a reference by the learned Munsif of Allahabad, purporting to be made u/s 617 of the old Code of Civil Procedure. The question submitted is, whether the salary of a public officer on leave is attachable, and whether the nature of his leave and the fact of his drawing half pay can affect the attachment of his salary. It appears to us that it was not competent for the learned Munsif to refer this question to this Court and for this reason. The decree which was in the course of execution was not a final decree but was appealable. Section 617 provides that if before or on the hearing of a suit, or an appeal in which the decree is final, or if in the execution of any such decree (i.e., any decree which is final), any question of law or usage having the force of law * * * arises, on which the Court may * * * * refer the matter to the High Court for decision. Inasmuch as the decree under execution in this case was appealable, and was, therefore, not a final decree, the section clearly has no application, The learned Munsif must himself determine the question which has arisen, and only after its determination can this Court entertain the question. We decline therefore, to pass any orders on the question Let the record be returned.