High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 10 CAL CK 0369

Dayamoy Das Modak & Ors. vs Ranjit Kumar Dey

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 6 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J · Sandip Kumar De, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
FAT 309 of 2026 with CAN 1 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 115 words
1.

Learned counsel for the appellants rightly points out that the valuation of the suit from which the appeal arises is Rs.81,000/-.

2.

Accordingly, FAT 309 of 2026 is dismissed on the ground of lack of pecuniary jurisdiction, with liberty to the appellants to prefer an appeal on the self-same grounds and against the self-same judgment and decree before the appropriate court having jurisdiction.

3.

The learned Advocate-on-record for the appellants shall be at liberty to take back the certified copies of the impugned judgment and decree upon furnishing photocopies of the same for the records.

4.

CAN 1 of 2026 is consequentially disposed of as well. There will be no order as to costs.