Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 03 NCLAT CK 0010

Datta Balbhim Shinde vs Mohandas Chattaram & Anr

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 4 March 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson (J) · Dr. Alok Srivastava, Member (T)
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 224 Of 2022 & I.A No. 618 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 257 words
1.

This is an Application I.A No. 618 of 2022 filed by the Appellant bringing on record the Terms of Settlement arrived between the parties i.e. Financial Creditor and the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated by order dated 18.02.2022 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Court No. V, Mumbai Bench, on an Application filed by the Financial Creditor- the Respondent before us.

2.

It is submitted by Learned Counsel for the Appellant that order could be uploaded on 26.02.2022 and Committee of Creditors (CoC) has not yet been constituted.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Interim Resolution Professional is also present who does not dispute that the statement that CoC has not yet been constituted. He further submits that the Appellant ought to have approach the Interim Resolution Professional for filing an Application by giving Form FA.

4.

In view of the fact that matter has been taken in this Appeal being Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No. 224 of 2022 and Application has come up before us, that parties have settled before constitution of the CoC, we are of the view that this settlement be accepted on record and this Appeal be closed withdrawing the order dated 18.02.2022 of the Adjudicating Authority for initiating the CIRP. The parties shall abide by the Terms of Settlement. The order accordingly.

5.

Learned  Counsel  appearing  for  the  Appellant  submits  that  the professional fees of Rs. 1.5 lakh plus expenses of the IRP shall be paid by the Appellant.

The Appeal is disposed of.