High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 11 SHI CK 0342

Dasoundi Ram vs State of H.P. and Others

High Court Of Himachal Pradesh · Decided on 1 November 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kuldip Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
C.W.P. (T) No. 6291 of 2008 (O.A. No. 3740 of 1999)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 191 words

Kuldip Singh, J.—The learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per the stand of the respondents the pensionary benefits have been paid to the petitioner. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that as per Annexure R-IV dated 24.4.2002 an amount of Rs. . 30,741/- has not been paid to petitioner, rather this amount has been recovered from the due amount payable to the petitioner. The Annexure R-IV dated 24.4.2002 has not been assailed in the petition. The respondents have shown cause in the reply that initially the pensionary benefits were not paid to the petitioner on account of some inquiry but lateron the pensionary benefits have been paid to the petitioner except an amount of Rs. . 30,741/- . In case the petitioner has still grievance regarding the recovery of Rs. . 30,741/- vide Annexure R-IV dated 24.4.2002 he is at liberty to approach the competent authority and the competent authority shall decide the matter within a period of two months from the date of filing representation alongwith a copy of this judgment by petitioner. The petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any.