Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2000) 04 SC CK 0067

Darbara Singh vs Paramjit Singh and Another

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 7 April 2000 · Citation: (2000) AIRSCW 4804 : (2000) 2 JT 359 Supp : (2000) 7 SCALE 267 : (2000) 8 SCC 557 : (2000) 7 Supreme 399 : (2001) 1 UC 155 : (2001) 1 UJ 88

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. S. M. Quadri, J · B. N. Kirpal, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 2490 of 2000 Arising out of SLP (C) No. 18331 of 1996

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 367 words

B.N.KIRPAL, J.-Special leave granted.

2.

The appellant was a victim of an accident and the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal awarded Rs.6 lakhs as damages but restricted liability of the respondents to the extent of 50 per cent. Appeal filed against the said decision was dismissed on the ground that there was a delay of 125 days.

3.

We have heard the counsel for the parties.

4.

In our view, the reason given in the application for condonation of delay, namely, inability of the appellant to take adequate steps for filing the appeal because he was under medical advice not to move, was sufficient cause for condoning the delay. Normally, we would have set aside the decision of the High Court and remanded the case but we think on the facts of the present case it is not necessary. This is because the Tribunal has found as a fact that at the time when the accident occurred the appellant was driving on the correct side of the road and the motor car coming from the opposite side was being driven in a zigzag manner and it struck the motorcycle by coming to the wrong side of the road. In view of this finding, it would not follow that there was any contributory negligence and, therefore, restricting the compensation to Rs.3 lakhs only was incorrect. Counsel for the appellant has very fairly stated that if the amount of 50 per cent which remains due, in view of the decision now given, is paid by the insurance company within the stipulated time, then the appellant will not insist on interest at the rate of 12 per cent which had been awarded by the Tribunal on 50 per cent of the compensation which has already been received by the appellant.

5.

We, accordingly, allow the appeal and hold that in the event of the insurance company paying to the appellant or depositing in the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal the amount of Rs.3 lakhs within six weeks the decree shall stand satisfied. Failing such payment/deposit, the appellant will be entitled to realize from the respondents the amount of Rs.3 lakhs plus interest at the rate of 12 per cent.

6.

No costs.