High CourtsDivision Bench(1927) 10 MAD CK 0004

Damarla Subbiah vs Muhummad Mastan Sahib

Madras High Court · Decided on 13 October 1927 · Citation: AIR 1928 Mad 391 : 108 Ind. Cas. 66

HON’BLE JUDGES
Devadoss, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 289 words

Devadoss, J.—This is an application to revise the order of the District Magistrate of Guntur that no sanction of Government u/s 197,

Criminal P.C., is necessary for the prosecution of the president of the panchayat Court. The learned Public Prosecutor informs me that the District

Magistrate has written to him to say that this sentence is a clerical error which has crept into his order. It cannot be said to be a clerical error

because a whole sentence with a definite opinion is embodied in the order. Evidently the District Magistrate did not mean to pass the order. It was

probably an expression of opinion by him which was by mistake embodied in the order drawn up and which was afterwards signed by some

officer for the District Magistrate. Seeing that the District Magistrate clearly says that he never intended to pass this order, it cannot be taken to be

his order. But inasmuch as a copy of the order has been given to the petitioner the only proper course would be to quash this portion of the District

Magistrate''s order which is said to be due to a clerical mistake. The mischief of this unfortunate clerical mistake has been the reason of the Sub-

Divisional Magistrate taking the case on his, file notwithstanding the objection of the petitioner on the ground of want of sanction. For I find the

order among the records of the case in the Divisional Magistrate''s Court. The petitioner acted in his capacity as a Judge and as such sanction is

required u/s 197, Criminal P.C., for prosecuting him for anything done in that capacity. The proceedings before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate of

Guntur are quashed for want of proper sanction u/s 197, Criminal P.C.