AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
Anil Sharma, Judge
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners u/s 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the order dated 09-08-2012 passed by learned trial Court
whereby the application filed u/s 320 of Cr.P.C. by the both the parties has been dismissed and further prayer has been made in this petition to
permit the parties to compound the offence. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that initially complainant/respondent No. 2 has lodged an
FIR at Police Station Gole Ka Mandir, Gwalior against the petitioners on a dispute of encashing the demand draft which belongs to respondent
No. 2, however after sometime good sense prevailed between the parties and they have entered into a compromise. He further submits that
wrongly the name of complainant has been mentioned as Sishupal Singh Yadav while the correct name of complainant is Sishupal Singh.
The application u/s 320 of Cr.P.C. has been filed by both the parties before learned trial Court and the prayer has been made to compound the
matter but since the offences in which the compromise has been sought are not compoundable, therefore, learned trial Court has rejected the
application of both the parties. By invoking the inherent jurisdiction of this Court both the parties have appeared and intended to compound the
matter.
In support of arguments and further to strengthen the case, learned counsel for the petitioners placed reliance on the decision of Shiji alias Pappu
and others Vs. Radhika and another, (2012) 1 SCC (Cri) 101 in which the case for offence u/s 394 of IPC has been compounded in compromise.
Further reliance has been placed on the decision of Madan Mohan Abbot Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 2008 SC 1969 in which the offence u/s 406
of IPC has been compounded. Thus, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Court has inherent power u/s 482 to compound the
offence involved in the present case.
In the light of above observations and for the foregoing reasons, I allow the petition and quash the S.T. No. 99/2012 pending before learned
Tenth Additional Sessions Judge, Gwalior for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467 and 471 of IPC. In the result, the proceedings of
aforesaid session trial are quashed and petitioners are discharged from the offence under Sections 420, 467 and 471 of IPC. A copy of this order
be sent to the trial court concerned for information and compliance.
