High CourtsSingle Bench(2016) 12 P&H CK 0156

Daljit Singh @ Kala vs State of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 December 2016 · Citation: (2017) 2 CriCC 391 : (2017) 1 RCRCriminal 983

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jitendra Chauhan, J.
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CRM-M No. 41163 of 2016 (O&M)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 251 words

Jitendra Chauhan, J. (Oral)—By filing the present petition, under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has sought regular bail in FIR No. 153 dated 31.08.2016, registered under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, at Police Station GRP, Ludhiana.

2.

It is contended that the petitioner was neither arrested from the spot nor any recovery was effected from him. In fact, the petitioner has been framed in the present FIR on the basis of disclosure statement of co-accused, Vikas who had stated that the alleged contraband i.e. 4 kg of charas was to be delivered to the petitioner. The FSL report has not been received so far. The petitioner is in custody since 02.09.2016.

3.

On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the bail application and admits the above factual aspect of the matter.

4.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

5.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 02.09.2016; the challan has not been presented so far, therefore, it can safely be inferred that the conclusion of trial will take a long time, without adverting to the merits of the instant case, this petition is allowed. The petitioner be admitted to bail during the pendency of trial, on his furnishing bail bonds and surety bonds, to the satisfaction of the trial Court.

6.

Anything said herein above shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.