High CourtsSingle Bench(2005) 05 P&H CK 0080

Daljit Singh vs State of Punjab and Others

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 18 May 2005 · Citation: (2005) 141 PLR 748 : (2005) 3 RCR(Civil) 786

HON’BLE JUDGES
Jasbir Singh, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 5988 of 1986

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 364 words

Jasbir Singh, J.—Petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer to issue writ of Certiorari to quash orders dated 28.1.1985 and 25.5.1986, Annexures P/l and P/6 respectively.

2.

It is apparent from record that vide order, Annexure P/l, competent authority-respondent No. 3 by invoking provisions of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, while deciding the question of surplus land with the petitioner, declared 11 kanals 6 marlas of land surplus with the petitioner. Appeal against the order referred to above, was dismissed by the appellate authority, vide order dated 29.5.1986, Annexure P/6. Hence, this writ petition.

3.

Counsel for the petitioner has submitted that aforesaid Act was repeaded by the Parliament by passing Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 (Act No. 15 of 1999). He further submitted that a notification was also issued by the State of Punjab on 30th May, 2000 authenticating repeal of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. Counsel contends that in view of the passing of Act No. 15 of 1999, and the notification issued by the State of Punjab, orders under challenge, stand abated and writ petition is required to be allowed in that regard.

4.

He has also placed reliance upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in C.W.P. No. 8432 of 1987 (Tilak Raj Katyal v. The State of Punjab and Ors.,1) rendered on January 16, 2001, wherein while dealing with a similar situation, it was held that in view of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1976 (Act No. 15 of 1999) and the Notification issued by the State of Punjab, impugned orders passed by the authorities while exercising powers under the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, have become meaningless, having abated.

5.

Shri Bishnoi has failed to controvert the contention raised by counsel for the petitioner.

6.

In view of the situation explained above, this writ petition is allowed in the same terms as in order passed in Civil Writ Petition No. 8432 of 1987. Orders impugned in the present petition are declared to have been abated having no effect against rights of the petitioner.