High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 CHH CK 2018

Dalit Kumar Kurre & Ors. vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur · Decided on 9 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
WPC No. 2715 of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 343 words
1.

The petitioners, in this Writ Petition, have prayed for the following reliefs:-

“10.1

That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to provide the some other land in place of the land of the petitioners which has been shown at present either playground of the education department or big brush forest and in alternative may kindly be directed to provide compensation of the land measuring area 5 acres to the petitioners.

10.2

That, any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioner in the interest of justice along with cost of the petition.”

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners’ land bearing Khasra No. 1/27, admeasuring 5 acres, has been used by the respondent authorities for public purposes without providing any alternative land or compensation. He further submits that the respondents have neither given a specific reply to the petitioners’ claim nor provided any alternative land or compensation, therefore, this petition has been filed seeking appropriate relief.

3.

Per contra, learned State counsel submits that as per the reports of the revenue authorities, the petitioners were never in possession of the land in question, which is presently being used as a playground for the concerned school and for nistari purpose by the villagers. Therefore, the petitioners are not entitled to any relief.

4.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and having perused the material available on record, particularly the reports of the revenue authorities, it appears that the impugned order has been passed in accordance with law, as the reports categorically state that the petitioners were never in possession of the land in question. The reports also indicate that the said land was earlier used as Gotlu and is presently being used as a playground for the concerned school and as a thoroughfare (Nistari) by the villagers. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court finds no ground to interfere with the impugned order.

5.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed.