High CourtsFull Bench(2003) 09 RAJ CK 0011

CWT vs Santosh Chand

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 4 September 2003 · Citation: (2004) 136 TAXMAN 331

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Keshote, J · F.C. Bansal, J
CASE NUMBER
Wealth Tax Reference No. 57 of 1988 4 September 2003

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 237 words

S.K. Keshote, J.

On the application of the revenue filed u/s 27(3) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur has referred the following question for our opinion :

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in upholding the decision of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner that in the case of residential properties rule 1BB being procedural, would apply to assessment years 1972-73 to 1977-78, even prior to 1-4-1979?"

2.

The matter arises out of the Wealth Tax Appeal No. 96 (Jp)/1986, assessment year 1975-76.

3.

The learned counsel for the revenue advanced manifold contentions but we are satisfied that the rule 1BB is procedural and, therefore, it has a retrospective effect. Looking to this nature of the provision being a procedure and would equally apply to all pending assessment and the learned Tribunal is thus not incorrect in its approach.

4.

In the case of Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Meerut Vs. Sharvan Kumar Swarup and Sons, their Lordships of the Honble Supreme Court held this rule a procedural and having retrospective effect. We do not find any infirmity in the view taken by the Tribunal.

5.

As a result of the aforesaid discussion we answer the question referred by the learned Tribunal for our opinion in affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. This reference accordingly stands disposed of.