High CourtsFull Bench(2001) 08 DEL CK 0143

CWT vs Begum Qamar Sarwar Ali

Delhi High Court · Decided on 6 August 2001 · Citation: (2001) 119 TAXMAN 762

HON’BLE JUDGES
Arijit Pasayat, C.J · D.K. Jain, J
CASE NUMBER
WT Reference No''s. 4 and 5 of 1983 6 August 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 179 words

Arijit Pasayat, C.J.

At the instance of the revenue, the following question has been referred, in respect of two reference applications, for opinion of this court by the Tribunal, Delhi Bench-C, u/s 27(1) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in law in coming to the conclusion that the right of the assessed to the property left by the father, late Nawab of Rampur, valued by the Wealth Tax Officer at Rs. 2,87,460 (assessment year 1967-68) and Rs. 8,83,083 (assessment year 1972-73) could not be treated as her wealth liable to be included in her total wealth ?"

2.

Factual aspects may not be noted in detail in view of the fact that in WT Reference No. 93 of 1983 in the assessed''s own case, by order dated 12-10-2000 we have remitted the matter back to the Tribunal for fresh hearing. We direct, accordingly, so far as these cases are concerned.

3.

The reference applications stand disposed of.