High CourtsFull Bench(2003) 11 AHC CK 0029

CWT vs Agarwal Market (AOP)

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 13 November 2003 · Citation: (2005) 142 TAXMAN 70

HON’BLE JUDGES
Umeshwar Pandey, J · M. Katjui, J
CASE NUMBER
WT Application No. 130 of 1998 13 November 2003

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 182 words
1.

Heard Sri A.N. Mahajan for the department and Sri Rakesh Shanker for the assessee.

2.

This is a Wealth Tax Reference u/s 27(3) of the Wealth Tax Act in which the following questions are sought to be referred to us for our opinion :

"1. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Hon''ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was legally justified in holding that the asset Agarwal Market is to be assessed in the hands of each of the co-owners separately and not in the hands of assessing officer ?

2.

Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Hon''ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was legally justified in holding that provisions of section 3 and section 4(1)(b) of the Wealth Tax Act are applicable in this case rather than section 21AA ?"

3.

Similar application has been allowed in CWT v. Suresh (WT Appeal No. 67 of 1997) UITC 408.

4.

Hence we direct the Tribunal to state a case and refer the above questions to us for our opinion.

Application is allowed.