High CourtsDivision Bench(2017) 11 DEL CK 0199

CPL Uttam Dubey vs Union Of India And Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 24 November 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Hima Kohli, J · Vinod Goel, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 10430 Of 2017 , Civil Miscellaneous No. 42624 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

17 paragraphs · 328 words
1.

The petitioner seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus to the respondent No.2/Chief of Air Staff, Air HQ (Vayu Bhavan), directing him to dispose of

his Redressal of Grievance application dated 05.6.2017 and an application dated 19.6.2017 [Annexure P-1 (colly)].

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that while the aforesaid applications submitted by the petitioner were still pending disposal by the

respondent No.2, in the meantime, the respondent No.4 awarded a punishment of severe reprimand to the petitioner, on 23.8.2017.

3.

Pertinently, the order dated 23.8.2017 is not record. Further, the said order has been passed against the petitioner, who is posted at Air Force

Station, Naliya, Gujarat by his Commanding Officer, who is also posted at the same place.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he had submitted an RTI application dated 21.8.2017, for obtaining a copy of the charge sheet and the

punishment, which is pending. We may note that the records before us do not substantiate the said submission. In any event, the cause of action in

respect of the subsequent charge sheet and the punishment awarded against the petitioner on 23.8.2017, has not arisen in the territorial jurisdiction of

this Court and the petitioner should have approach the competent court vested with territorial jurisdiction for relief against the punishment awarded to

him on 23.08.2017.

5.

Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to confine the relief in the present petition only in respect of prayer (a) by directing the respondent No.2 to

consider and decide the Redressal of Grievance application dated 5.6.2017 and the application dated 19.6.2017 submitted by the petitioner, within two

weeks from today under written intimation to him. If aggrieved thereby, the petitioner may seek legal recourse, as may be available to him.

6.

Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the competent court vested with territorial jurisdiction in respect of prayer (b) made in the present

petition.

7.

The petition is disposed of along with pending application.