High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 04 CAL CK 0037

COUNTRYMAN TELEFILMS PVT. LTD. & ORS. vs ALLAHABAD BANK & ANR

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 30 April 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
CS 31 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 167 words

The Court: Counsel for the plaintiff, defendant and added defendant are present. It appears from an order dated 5th February, 2018 that the defendant

no.2/added defendant was given time to file its written statement within a period of three weeks after receipt of the copy of the plaint. Counsel

appearing for the added defendant submits that the plaint was received on 16th of February, 2018. However, no steps thereafter have been taken by

the added defendant.

Counsel for the defendant submits that all the original documents are with the added defendant and added defendant may therefore be directed to file

the Judge’s Brief of Documents with the original documents.

As prayed for by the parties, the added defendant/defendant no.2 is directed to file written statement as well as the Judge’s Brief of Document

within a period of one week from date. Let the matter appear thereafter in my list.

Learned counsel for the defendant no.2 seeks leave to file Vokalatnama in the department. Such leave is granted.