Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1997) 02 SC CK 0208

Controller of Estate Duty, Madras vs Sankaranaidu Ammal (Smt.)

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 4 February 1997 · Citation: (1997) 10 SCC 195

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. B. Majmudar, J · K. S. Paripoornan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 6350 Of 1983

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 189 words

K.S. Paripoornan and; S.B. Majmudar, JJ.-This appeal is filed by the Revenue. The sole question that arose for consideration, was whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the exemption provided under Section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 should be allowed in respect of the dwelling house of the Hindu undivided families before determining the share of the deceased and also that of the lineal descendants, the former for assessment and the latter for aggregation. The High Court decided the case in favour of the assessee. The Revenue is in appeal

2.

Heard learned counsel

3.

The Estate Duty Act, 1953 is no longer in force. The assessee in this case died as early as on 10-5-1964. The original assessment was made in 1966. The value of the house was assessed at Rs. 60, 000 and the deceased''s 1/5th share was determined at Rs. 12, 000. The duty involved is very small. Considering the facts, that the duty involved is small and the Act is no longer in force, we do not consider it worthwhile to decide the appeal on merit. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed.