High CourtsDivision Bench(1990) 06 BOM CK 0062

Controller of Estate Duty vs V.K.P. Singaporia

Bombay High Court · Decided on 5 June 1990 · Citation: (1990) 185 ITR 654

HON’BLE JUDGES
T.D. Sugla, J · Sujata V. Manohar, J
CASE NUMBER
Estate Duty Reference No. 19 of 1976

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 253 words

T.D. Sugla, J.—There is only one question of law involved in this reference. Thee question reads thus :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the gift-tax of Rs. 1,26,213 payable as per assessments completed after the death of the deceased is an allowable debt against the estate of the deceased u/s 44 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 ?"

2.

It is fairly stated by Shri Jetley, learned counsel for the Department, that there are many decisions including the latest one of the Supreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Madras Vs. K.S.N. Bhatt, , where in the context of wealth-tax proceedings, it was held that liability towards wealth-tax, Income Tax and gift-tax which crystallise on the relevant valuation date are to be deducted from the wealth even though the assessment orders are finalised after the valuation date. It was, however, pointed out that there was no direct decision under the Estate Duty Act on the question.

3.

In our opinion, the ratio of the decision is squarely applicable in the case of determination of the principal value of the estate for estate duty purposes. We uphold the order of the Tribunal that the liability to gift-tax in respect of gifts made by the deceased during his lifetime was deductible from the principal value of the estate. Accordingly, we answer the question in the affirmative and in favour of the accountable person.

4.

No order as to costs.