High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 12 DEL CK 2050

Constable Vijay Kumar vs Union Of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 3 December 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Navin Chawla, J · Girish Kathpalia, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 16639/2024 & CM APPL. 70372/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 330 words

NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)

1.

This petition has been filed by petitioner praying for the following reliefs:

“a. Issue a Writ of Certiorari and/or an appropriate writ/order/direction of a similar nature, quash and set aside the Court of Inquiry dated 21.07.2023 and the findings dated 30.07.2023 and the opinion dated 30.07.2023 prepared by the Respondent; AND

b. Issue a Writ of Certiorari and/or an appropriate writ/order/direction of a similar nature, quash and set aside the Show Cause Notice for Retirement on grounds of physical unfitness dated 07.11.2024

c. Issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or an appropriate writ/order/direction of a similar nature, to grant disability pension to the petitioner.”

2.

As far as findings of the Court of Inquiry are concerned, the respondents are yet to pass an order based thereon. Similarly, only a Show Cause Notice has been issued in response to which the petitioner has made a detailed representation. In case the petitioner is aggrieved of the decision that may be taken by the respondents, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.

3.

We are, therefore, of the opinion that the present petition at this stage is premature in nature.

4.

We dispose of the present petition by directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereon. We make it clear that in case the order so passed is adverse to the interest of the petitioner, it shall be open to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.

5.

At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is completely blind and should be referred to the Blind School run by the BSF, so that he can at least have some other training that would help him sustain himself. The respondents shall also consider this prayer of the petitioner and take necessary action thereon.

6.

The petition and the application are disposed of in the above terms.