High CourtsDivision Bench(1976) 01 AHC CK 0027

Commissioner, Sales Tax vs Niazia Electric Works

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 5 January 1976 · Citation: (1976) 38 STC 439

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.B. Asthana, C.J · C.S.P. Singh, J
CASE NUMBER
S.T.R. Appeal No. 220 of 1973

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 168 words

K.B. Asthana, C.J.—We have heard the learned standing counsel. We adopt the definition of commutator given in the British Encyclopaedia which is "a device in a dynamo by which an alternating current is converted into a continuous one". A continuous current is also electricity. A continuous current cannot be generated unless a commutator is used in a dynamo. Continuous current, therefore, can only be generated or produced through the use of the commutator. Commutator thus would be a device or an instrument which is connected with the generation of electricity. Commutator does not consume electricity. It only generates it though of a particular species. It is, therefore, different from the category of "electrical goods" and forms the class of goods known as "electrical equipment" as defined in Notification No. ST-7096/X-1012-1965 dated 1st October, 1965.

2.

We, therefore, answer the question referred in the negative, against the Sales Tax Commissioner and in favour of the assessee. The assessee is entitled to his costs which we assess at Rs. 100.