Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1995) 09 SC CK 0021

Commissioner, Religious and Charitable Endowments, Bangalore and Others vs Kasliyappa Gurukula Sri Vidya Shala

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 1 September 1995 · Citation: (1995) 6 JT 516 : (1995) 5 SCALE 263 : (1995) 6 SCC 481 : (1995) 3 SCR 246 Supp

HON’BLE JUDGES
K. Ramaswamy, J · B. L. Hansaria, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 8077 of 1995

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 172 words
1.

Though the respondent has been served,' he does not appear either in person or through counsel.

2.

Leave granted.

3.

Admittedly, the suit was filed in which the Government was set ex-parte and an ex-parte decree was granted. Then the State filed an application to set aside the ex-parte decree on February 17, 1984 and that petition was dismissed on the ground that the delay was not properly explained. The appeal was also dismissed by the High Court.

4.

The question is whether the State has properly given explanation for not filing the application to set aside the ex-parte decree within 30 days from the date of the knowledge. No notice required u/s 80 CPC was issued. In view of the fact that the office of the Government was informed on February 15, 1984, the Government must be deemed to have had notice of ex-parte decree from that date and within three days thereafter the application was filed. Therefore, there was no delay.

5.

The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.