High CourtsDivision Bench(1990) 11 DEL CK 0027

Commissioner of Wealth Tax vs Mithu H. Uttam

Delhi High Court · Decided on 27 November 1990 · Citation: (1991) 192 ITR 106

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Duggal, J · B.N. Kirpal, J
CASE NUMBER
Wealth-tax Case No. 4 of 1989

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 206 words
1.

The petitioner seeks reference of the following question to this court :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in directing that the benefit of section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, be allowed to the assessed by ignoring the material fact that provisions of section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act are applicable only if the property is owned by the assessed and is exclusively used by him for residential purposes throughout the period of twelve months immediately preceding the valuation date ?"

2.

In the present case, the executor was also the beneficiary under the will of the late owner. The Tribunal rightly came to the conclusion that the benefit u/s 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act was attracted. The Department is laying emphasis on the fact that the respondent was the executor of the will but it seems to ignore the fact that, as held by the Tribunal, he is also the beneficiary under the will and he has himself occupied the premises for 12 months. He was, Therefore, entitled to the benefit of section 7(4). The answer to the question proposed is self-evident and, Therefore, need not be called for.