High CourtsDivision Bench(1996) 12 MAD CK 0034

Commissioner of Wealth-tax vs L. Boriah Gowder

Madras High Court · Decided on 12 December 1996 · Citation: (1998) 232 ITR 429

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.V. Balasubramanian, J · K.A. Thanikkachalam, J
CASE NUMBER
Tax Case No. 1888 of 1984 (Reference No. 1371 of 1984)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 201 words

K.A. Thanikkachalam, J.—At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following question for the opinion of this court for

the assessment year 1976-77 u/s 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 :

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the assessee''s status should be

adopted as that of a Hindu undivided family for purposes of his wealth-tax assessment ?

2.

The point for consideration is whether the assessee''s status should be adopted as that of a Hindu undivided family for the purposes of his

wealth-tax assessment. The Tribunal held that the status of the assessee is that of a Hindu undivided family for the assessment year 1976-77. A

similar question came up for consideration before this court in the case of the same assessee in the assessment years 1972-73 to 1974-75, wherein

this court held that the status of the assessee is not that of a Hindu undivided family. This decision was in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. L.

Balasubramaniam and Another, .

3.

In view of the abovesaid decision, we answer the question referred to us in the negative and in favour of the Department. No costs.