High CourtsDivision Bench(1992) 03 P&H CK 0099

Commissioner of Wealth-tax vs Arvind Nayyar

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 9 March 1992 · Citation: (1992) 197 ITR 349

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.S. Sodhi, J · G.C. Garg, J
CASE NUMBER
Wealth-tax Case No. 3 of 1991

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 189 words
1.

There is an apparent conflict of judicial opinion on the legal issue sought to be raised here. The High Court of Gauhati in Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Harendra Prasad Singh and Another, and Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Tarachand Agarwalla, as also the High Courts of Patna and Calcutta in Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Nand Lal Jalan, and Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Mira Mehta, , respectively, have taken one view while the contrary view has been expressed by the High Court of Madras in Purushothamdas Gocooldas and Others Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, . In view of this conflict of views, this is clearly a fit case for us to direct the Tribunal to make a reference to this court of the question posed. We order accordingly.

2.

[The question of law referred to the High Court was " whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in allowing deduction u/s 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, in respect of the assessee''s share in land and building of the firm in which he is a partner ?" ]