High CourtsDivision Bench(1989) 01 MAD CK 0026

Commissioner of Wealth-tax vs A.R. Balakrishnan

Madras High Court · Decided on 31 January 1989 · Citation: (1990) 181 ITR 56

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Ratnam, J · Bhakthavatsalam, J
CASE NUMBER
Tax Case No. 1069 of 1979

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 244 words

Ratnam, J.—u/s 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, at the instance of the Revenue, the following question of law has been referred for the

opinion of this court :

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the loans secured by the

assessee on the house property at Cross-cut Road, Coimbatore, should be allowed in full even though a sum of Rs. 1,00,000 was allowed as

exemption u/s 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act and a sum of Rs. 26,229 alone was included in the net wealth of the assessee as the value of the

house property referred to above ?

2.

We find that the question referred has already been dealt with in the decision of a Full Bench of this court in Premier Electro Mechanical

Fabricators Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, . The present case will fall under category (ii), in that the Tribunal has allowed deduction of the entire

debt as a whole as against the allowance of a part in proportion to the tax exempted value of the secured assessment. Consequently, in view of the

decision of the Full Bench referred to earlier, the questions referred to us have to be answered in the negative and in favour of the Revenue. The

Tribunal is directed to work out the proportion on the facts of this case. There will be no order as to costs in this reference.