High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 06 MP CK 0033

Commissioner of Sales Tax vs Surana Traders

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 26 June 2002 · Citation: (2003) 129 STC 255

HON’BLE JUDGES
Nirmal Kumar Jain, J · Deepak Verma, J
CASE NUMBER
M.C.C. No. 539 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 191 words
1.

Heard.

2.

This reference u/s 44 of the Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 (since repealed) is made at the instance of the Revenue for resolution of the following question :

"Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in setting aside the penalty u/s 45-B of the M.P. General Sales Tax Act, 1958 as the assessee was exempted from payment of tax but was not prohibited from collecting the tax from customers."

3.

It is seen that the question involved stands answered by a division Bench decision of this Court in Commissioner of Sales Tax, M.P. v. Akshya Industries [1996] 29 VKN 142 wherein it is held that the assessee is not liable to pay penalty u/s 45-B of the Act even if it has recovered tax from the customers. Accordingly we answer the question in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

4.

A copy of this order be transmitted to the Board of Revenue with reference to their reference No. 72-PBR/91 arising from the order dated July 19, 1991 passed by the Tribunal in Second Appeal No. 209-I of 1988.