High CourtsSingle Bench(1988) 04 AHC CK 0068

Commissioner of Sales Tax vs Jrusgu Discs Private Ltd.

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 5 April 1988 · Citation: (1988) 71 STC 436

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.R. Misra, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Sales Tax Revision No. 1058 of 1986

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 226 words

R.R. Misra, J.—This revision has been filed against an order dated 30th June, 1986 passed by a Division Bench of the Sales Tax Tribunal under which it has been directed that the appeal be listed for hearing before a single Member Bench.

2.

Admittedly, the second appeal is still pending before the Tribunal. Learned counsel for the assessee has raised a preliminary objection regarding maintainability of this revision in this Court. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I find that there is considerable force in the said preliminary objection. Under Sub-section (1) of Section 11 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") a revision lies before the High Court only against an order passed under Sub-section (4) or (5) of Section 10 of the Act. From a bare reading of the aforesaid Sub-sections (4) and (5) of Section 10, it is clear that the orders contemplated by the said two sub-sections are final orders which finally dispose of the appeal before the Tribunal. In my opinion, the present order which is subject-matter of consideration before me is not an order contemplated by the aforesaid Sub-sections (4) and (5) of Section 10 of the Act and no revision lies against the same. In these circumstances, I find that the present revision is not maintainable. It is accordingly dismissed with costs.