High CourtsDivision Bench(2013) 05 DEL CK 0274

Commissioner of Police and Another vs Dinesh Kumar

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 May 2013

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Kameswar Rao, J · Pradeep Nandrajog, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (C) 3931 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

19 paragraphs · 359 words

Pradeep Nandrajog, J.—For the reasons of the law contained in our opinion dated April 29, 2013 deciding a batch of writ petitions, lead

matter being WP(C) No. 4052/2012 of ''Commissioner of Police v. Mukesh Kumar'', instant writ petition has to be dismissed. Pithily stated the

reason would be the law declared by the Supreme Court in the opinion reported as Pawan Kumar Vs. State of Haryana and another, ; as also the

law declared by a Division Bench of this Court in the opinion reported as Govt of NCT of Delhi and Another Vs. Robin Singh, .

2.

The law declared was that every conviction for an offence would not require an inference to be drawn that the antecedent and character of the

wrong doer is of a kind that public employment has to be denied.

3.

With reference to offences being misdemeanour and felonies. Further, offences being classified as cognizable and non-cognizable; bailable as

well as non-bailable, it was highlighted that only such offences which have an element of moral turpitude would warrant public employment to be

denied.

4.

Indisputably, conviction faced by the respondent is for the offence punishable u/s 279 IPC i.e. rash and negligent driving. The conviction was on

an admission of guilt with fine imposed in sum of Rs. 500/-. The respondent was on a motor cycle and had hit an old lady in a crowded area. It has

to be highlighted that the respondent was not driving a four wheel vehicle or a passenger vehicle. Being appointed as Constable (Driver), working

with the Delhi Police the respondent would be driving four wheel vehicle.

5.

The ills of keeping people out of society in the form of breeding criminality have been highlighted in Robin Singh''s case (supra) with reference to

an ''All India Seminar on Correctional Service'' held at New Delhi in March 19, 1969.

6.

Accordingly, we are of the opinion that the impugned decision dated March 07, 2012 does not warrant any interference.

7.

The direction issued by the Tribunal be complied with by the petitioner within a period of eight weeks from today. No costs.

CM No. 8241/2012

Dismissed as infructuous.