High CourtsDivision Bench(2022) 09 DEL CK 0227

Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) Delhi vs Petrotech

Delhi High Court · Decided on 28 September 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manmohan, J · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax Appeal No. 372, 373 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 295 words

Manmohan, J

1.

Present income tax appeals have been filed challenging the common impugned order dated 5th October, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 6778 & 6779/Del./2017 for Assessment Years 2013-14 & 2014-15.

2.

Learned counsel for the Appellant/Revenue states that the ITAT has erred in not appreciating that the activities of the Assessee­society/Respondent-herein are in the nature of trade, commerce or business, and thus the benefit of exemption under Section 11 & Section 12 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) cannot be given to the Appellant.

3.

Admittedly, the questions of law urged in the present appeals are covered by the decision dated 20th December, 2017 of this Court in assessee’s own case in ITA 1172/2017. Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the Revenue has not accepted the aforesaid decision and has preferred a Special Leave Petition being Civil Appeal No. 9553/2018 against the same.

4.

Though the judgment of this Court has been challenged and is pending adjudication before the Supreme Court, yet there is no stay of the said judgment till date.

5.

Consequently, in view of the judgments passed by the Supreme Court in Kunhayammed and Others vs. State of Kerala and Another, (2000) 6 SCC 359 and Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Vs. Church of South India Trust Association CSI Cinod Secretariat, Madras (1992) 3 SCC 1, the present appeals are covered by the decision passed by the learned predecessor Division Bench in ITA 1172/2017.

6.

Accordingly, no substantial question of law arises for consideration in the present appeals and the same are dismissed.

7.

However, it is clarified that the order passed in the present appeals shall abide by the final decision of the Supreme Court in the aforesaid Civil Appeal.